Pyth 127 Share Posted November 21, 2017 I feel there is a issue with the state of the SDN and unsupported broken scripts not being updated or removed. I propose we remove scripts that are made by Scripters who haven't logged in for longer than 3 months, I also propose we remove their Scripter rank and they can apply for it if they ever become active again, although I'll leave that to the community if they agree with me on this and then possibly discuss further. With the latest update to the Make All interfaces there are a lot of unsupported scripts still on the SDN, by removing scripts that are no longer being supported, it'll help new users not feel disappointed when they buy a broken script and have to refund it. It'll also reduced clutter and help promote active Scripters as they usually get placed at the bottom of the SDN If you're getting paid you should at least log in once every 3 months. /Discuss Theorems 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
campyder 3 Share Posted November 21, 2017 just remove if the script doesnt work from an inactive scripter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nex 2519 Share Posted November 21, 2017 About time hell yes to this vote, also no offence to the maker but i dont think scripts that are to basic and have functions alot other scripts have should be on the sdn either starting to get abit messy Also id say if u get paid u should at least try to log in once a week just to check for bug reports Theorems 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hashtag 8303 Share Posted November 21, 2017 In my opinion, no. Not only if there's a need for it. Not logging in for three months should not be a reason to remove a script/scripter rank. If the script is functioning without problems and doesn't need updates, then of course the scripter can be inactive. However, if the script is broken and requires an update from the author, then yes. That's why we have a section where users can report broken scripts. Broken scripts should be removed indeed, but not working scripts whose author has been inactive. MrBananaMan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyth 127 Author Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) In my opinion, no. Not only if there's a need for it. Not logging in for three months should not be a reason to remove a script/scripter rank. If the script is functioning without problems and doesn't need updates, then of course the scripter can be inactive. However, if the script is broken and requires an update from the author, then yes. That's why we have a section where users can report broken scripts. Broken scripts should be removed indeed, but not working scripts whose author has been inactive. The main point I'm trying to get across is that they aren't putting in the time to check whether it works or not, No Scripter has 100% guarantee that their script is gonna work in 1 months time, let alone 3 months time. I feel as though there should be some sort of time requirement when you are given the rank and once every 3 months is still the bare minimum. Appreciate the input nonetheless. Edited November 21, 2017 by Pyth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExpansionPack 17 Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) Yes, most definitely. I have not been active for months, still my script is on the SDN with thousands of users. As for the rank removing itself, this should not be done as one has proved he/she is capable of being a Scripter. No need to show that again when turning active again. Edited November 21, 2017 by ExpansionPack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinh 496 Share Posted November 21, 2017 About time hell yes to this vote, also no offence to the maker but i dont think scripts that are to basic and have functions alot other scripts have should be on the sdn either starting to get abit messy Also id say if u get paid u should at least try to log in once a week just to check for bug reports theres tons of AIO Fighters, lets just remove all of Nex' combat scripts to start with dQw4w9WgXcQ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nex 2519 Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) theres tons of AIO Fighters, lets just remove all of Nex' combat scripts to start with / ghouls/yak are prob the only ones a AIO fighter could do tho , as the client doesn't support dungeons Edited November 21, 2017 by Nex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antonio Kala 28 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Can you give me an example of an inactive scripter that has some bugged scripts in the sdn atm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyth 127 Author Share Posted November 21, 2017 (edited) Can you give me an example of an inactive scripter that has some bugged scripts in the sdn atm? https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/topic/7354-dezvals-varrock-battlestaff-flipper-up-to-400khr-no-reqs/page-20 https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/topic/7587-dezvals-edgeville-falador-smelter-cannonballs-f2p-p2p/page-4 https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/topic/7291-aio-smither-f2p-p2p-dezvals-aio-smither/page-3 https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/topic/6136-299-f2p-100kh-gold-amulets/page-5 https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/topic/4487-jdv-woodcutting-all-log-types-wide-selection-of-locations/page-8 Includes the scripter saying he's not gonna update it : https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/topic/7852-xs-pest-control-early-access-50-off-discount-all-boats-prayers/page-5 Edited November 21, 2017 by Pyth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now