Comparing skill using getRealLevel doesn't work?

[Bultenen 0]

Hello! 😀

I'm working on  a combat script and i want to switch between Attack, Defense etc..

I currently have this:

if(getSkills().getRealLevel(Skill.ATTACK) <= 10) {
			switchCombat(0, 593, 3, 0, "Attack");
		}
		else if(getSkills().getRealLevel(Skill.STRENGTH) <= 10 && getSkills().getRealLevel(Skill.ATTACK) >= 10) {
			switchCombat(1, 593, 7, 0, "Strength");
		}
		else if(getSkills().getRealLevel(Skill.DEFENCE) <= 10 && getSkills().getRealLevel(Skill.ATTACK) >= 10 && getSkills().getRealLevel(Skill.STRENGTH) >= 10) {
			switchCombat(3, 593, 15, 0, "Defense");
		}

But everytime this script always goes into the combat tab widget and chooses "Stab" wich is Attack, even if my attack level is over 10.

So what am i doing wrong? 😅

[TheRevelo 7]

Does it even continue Stabbing when its 11?

[TheCloakdOne 389]

Looks like your widget child ID's are incorrect (this is weapon dependant dont forget) 

Widget cbtWidget = ctx.getWidgets().getWidget(593);
if (cbtWidget == null) {
    return 0;
}

    case ATTACK:
        cbtWidget.getChild(4).interact();
        break;
    case STRENGTH:
        cbtWidget.getChild(8).interact();
        break;
    case DEFENCE:
        cbtWidget.getChild(16).interact();
        break;

[Bultenen 0]

4 hours ago, TheRevelo said:

Does it even continue Stabbing when its 11?

Yes it does 😂

[Bultenen 0]

1 hour ago, TheCloakdOne said:

Looks like your widget child ID's are incorrect (this is weapon dependant dont forget) 

Widget cbtWidget = ctx.getWidgets().getWidget(593);
if (cbtWidget == null) {
    return 0;
}

    case ATTACK:
        cbtWidget.getChild(4).interact();
        break;
    case STRENGTH:
        cbtWidget.getChild(8).interact();
        break;
    case DEFENCE:
        cbtWidget.getChild(16).interact();
        break;

OH yeah that makes sense! Will try and will most definitely work! Thank you 😊

[TheRevelo 7]

1 minute ago, Bultenen said:

Yes it does 😂

Did you try out @TheCloakdOne 's solution?

Edit: Just reloaded page and saw that you already answered, nvm.