Mikasa 121 Share Posted November 16, 2014 So, the votes for unlimited is 6:4, but the vote for instancing is 8:1 Unlimited tabs = how many tabs you can run on a script. So if you vote yes for unlimited, you're against instancing. Make up your mind people! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliot 193 Share Posted November 16, 2014 So, the votes for unlimited is 6:4, but the vote for instancing is 8:1 Unlimited tabs = how many tabs you can run on a script. So if you vote yes for unlimited, you're against instancing. Make up your mind people! No, you're not understanding it. Unlimited means you can open unlimited tabs, this means you can run as many scripts as you want of scripts without instancing limits. Most scripts will not sell on a by instance basis, but some will. The instances will superscede any unlimited/tab restrictions. So if somebody makes a killer gold farming script they can sell it by-instance while I can sell my fighter as a one-time unlimited instance purchase (but you still need VIP to use unlimited amounts of it). I hope that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikasa 121 Share Posted November 16, 2014 No, you're not understanding it. Unlimited means you can open unlimited tabs, this means you can run as many scripts as you want of scripts without instancing limits. Most scripts will not sell on a by instance basis, but some will. The instances will superscede any unlimited/tab restrictions. So if somebody makes a killer gold farming script they can sell it by-instance while I can sell my fighter as a one-time unlimited instance purchase (but you still need VIP to use unlimited amounts of it). I hope that makes sense. Ah, I guess I kind of just assumed that instancing would be mandatory if the devs decided on it. xd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliot 193 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Ah, I guess I kind of just assumed that instancing would be mandatory if the devs decided on it. xd Nope, optional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandemic 2675 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Nope, optional. Not sure where you got that information, but please don't talk/speculate on the developers behalf. Nothing official has been said or even decided on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericthecmh 184 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Not sure where you got that information, but please don't talk/speculate on the developers behalf. Nothing official has been said or even decided on. No. Senior Sheriff Dog is the real decider of everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo 16 Share Posted November 16, 2014 What do donors get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eliot 193 Share Posted November 16, 2014 Not sure where you got that information, but please don't talk/speculate on the developers behalf. Nothing official has been said or even decided on. I don't make things up, that information is straight from what @Th3 said in the chatbox. Also, it is obvious that will be how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Explicit 213 Share Posted November 16, 2014 $19.99 may be nothing, but it's still significant, and I'd rather just go to somewhere else where I can get similar if not better ban rates for a lower price. We don't even know if DreamBot has good ban rates yet, it has been tested extensively by nobody, there is no proof it will be better in that regard (there are reasons to think it will, but no proof). This. I'd like to see how ban rates are on this bot when people begin using it on a daily basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ericthecmh 184 Share Posted November 16, 2014 I think the consensus right now is that: We will remove the limit on the tab count for the client, but we will add in (optional) script instancing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.