Neffarion 486 Share Posted August 20, 2017 Gerwin - https://dreambot.org/forums/index.php/user/77802-gerwin/ This guy started 2 paypal disputes of two private script feature payments for an unknown reason (he doesnt talk). All this script features were made and given some time ago (you can see on the discord screenshots the dates) First payment was of 45 Euros and another of 15 Euros 45 Euro Paypal screenshot of dispute 15 Euro Paypal screenshot of dispute Proof of agreeing to the payment for the 45 Euro feature: https://i.imgur.com/AoLpUi8.jpg Proof of receiving the script back with said feature included: https://i.imgur.com/6OJ0xds.jpg Proof of agreeing to another payment for the 15 Euro feature: https://i.imgur.com/tRONrdo.jpg Proof of receiving the script back with the said feature included: https://i.imgur.com/AOxpozn.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuclear Nezz 2055 Share Posted August 20, 2017 I've notified the user to respond to this dispute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwin 2 Share Posted August 21, 2017 The reason why I chargebacked is because the entire script was filled with so many flaws: A: From the very beginning I said the Grand Exchange feature isn't working properly, never ever did it do, always getting stuck at, ruining the entire script/bot and possibly get it banned so easily, and I said it at least a 100 times on Discord, but no you didn't fix it as of this day. B: The bot gets stuck after dying, you never fixed that. And this method involves a location with a lot of risk of dying, another reason why the script is completely useless since it get stuck. I had to bloody pay Dinh to fix that. C: The muling is absolutely garbage too, one out of 5 times it gets stuck and the entire mule operation is stuck, which causes all the bots to get stuck because of it. And we both know that ' lag ' doesn't make script stuck. D: The script is half working, and in this case it means not working at all. Those are my reasons to chargeback. Why don't I respond Discord is because I am done with you. Paid way too many for a script that isn't even working. Excuse to Banker, I didn't want to chargeback his money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neffarion 486 Author Share Posted August 21, 2017 - 1. Yes GE had issues but the last time you even mentioned GE features had issues was on April. You haven't said anything else regarding it ever since. If you don't say anything about it being broken for several months, you really expect me to know/think its broken? 2. Yes the script got stuck after dying. However saying I never fixed it is complete horseshit. As the fix I implemented was completely identical to Dinh's fix, and if his worked, then what I wrote must work. 3. You never mentioned mulling issues. Actually you even wanted more features with mulling, so it was completely normal to think it was running fine. 4. The charge-backs were not even related to anything you said. They were related to another separate script feature that was working correctly. Last time you ever said anything about something being broken was on on July and I provided a fix right after: http://i.imgur.com/Dhuqxoj.png So, after all these apparently broken features, you keep asking for more features (1,2,3,4,5) without referring any current broken ones at present time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuclear Nezz 2055 Share Posted August 21, 2017 Gerwin, do you have any proof of you bringing up any of these issues (other than the GE issue) If you did not tell him about the issues, or you did not ask him to fix the issues, then it's unreasonable for you to assume he would fix them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwin 2 Share Posted August 22, 2017 https://gyazo.com/e8d5e3fbdfccf17a7e2581e15e472738 https://gyazo.com/3a6ce0edeef41e79f3b070372ea90802 https://gyazo.com/7543f052be80398ec5ff951ffb96a908 https://gyazo.com/b8f9b6a04187745ec3ac334e6476b3bf I just gyazoed some text, I think only the first 2 or 3 pics are good. Gyazoed saying he will send the file, never did: Never sended that file, never refunded. 12 days later.. https://gyazo.com/d36d32d817b5dc7e564edbd792b7d396 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neffarion 486 Author Share Posted August 22, 2017 Funny how you don't want to include the parts that matter. So Dinh fixed it for you while I was away and busy IRL. (18th May) Right after you ask for more features: https://i.imgur.com/J4wtlMS.png You send me the script he compiled (jar file) with the fix. http://i.imgur.com/Gd8msqU.png Then I de-obfuscate and implement the small "dying and being stuck" fix he did (completely identical). (1,2) Then I send you the file with the feature you wanted and the changes : http://i.imgur.com/ou3ihTE.png Point still stands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuclear Nezz 2055 Share Posted August 24, 2017 From what I can tell, Neff made a majority working script, and was attempting to fix at least some of the issues. I believe a full refund (as in letting the chargeback continue) is out of the question. If you had to pay Dinh to fix the issues, then personally I believe that's on you. Rather than chargebacking for the script you purchased, you should have asked Neff for a partial refund so that you could use that money to pay Dinh to fix it, as Neff did not have the time (I believe he said that in one of his screenshots, someone correct me if I'm wrong) So my view is that you should discuss with Neff to find a middle grounds for a partial refund, and you should definitely pay him for the work he has done. If you paid Dinh 10 dollars to fix your 100 dollar script, that does not mean you do not have to pay for the 100 dollar script. (Numbers for ease of making my point.) If you do not do this, and instead choose to continue with your chargeback, you will be banned the same as any scammer would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwin 2 Share Posted August 29, 2017 Alright well we can discuss that here than, Neffarion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neffarion 486 Author Share Posted August 29, 2017 From what I can tell, Neff made a majority working script, and was attempting to fix at least some of the issues. I believe a full refund (as in letting the chargeback continue) is out of the question. If you had to pay Dinh to fix the issues, then personally I believe that's on you. Rather than chargebacking for the script you purchased, you should have asked Neff for a partial refund so that you could use that money to pay Dinh to fix it, as Neff did not have the time (I believe he said that in one of his screenshots, someone correct me if I'm wrong) So my view is that you should discuss with Neff to find a middle grounds for a partial refund, and you should definitely pay him for the work he has done. If you paid Dinh 10 dollars to fix your 100 dollar script, that does not mean you do not have to pay for the 100 dollar script. (Numbers for ease of making my point.) If you do not do this, and instead choose to continue with your chargeback, you will be banned the same as any scammer would. Alright well we can discuss that here than, Neffarion? , The PayPal charge-back obviously continued and he won it, therefore I was forced to give him 60 Eur for a script that I always tried to make sure It was working ever since his last msg. He literally charged-back a part of the script for bugs that were already fixed or things that he did not tell me were broken (I have yet to see them, I ran the script myself). More importantly, he charged-back without even messaging me first about anything. I do not owe him anything. If he paid Dinh to fix a small issue with the script when I wasn't able to for the time being, due to IRL stuff, thats with him, I never told him to do that or that he needed to do that. @Gerwin Discussing is something you should have done, before any of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.